What is a thesis statement about smoking should be banned?

Better Organization: Smoking is a serious problem because it harms the health of both smokers and nonsmokers; however, a viable two-part solution to the dangerous problem of smoking is to increase the tax on cigarettes and ban smoking in public places.

Should there be a ban on smoking in public places essay?

There is no dearth of scientific studies that prove the myriad harmful and life-threatening effects of smoking. Smoking affects lungs, causes many respiratory diseases, causes lung cancer, heart disease, and chewing tobacco can also cause mouth cancer.

Should smoking be banned essay ielts?

Medical studies have shown that smoking not only leads to health problems for the smoker, but also for people close by. As a result of this, many believe that smoking should not be allowed in public places. Although there are arguments on both sides, I strongly agree that a ban is the most appropriate course of action.

Is it right to ban smoking essay?

It encourages people to take steps to better their quality of life and to take care of themselves as well as the people around them. Therefore, smoking should be banned in all public places….Smoking Should be Banned in all Public Places.

✅ Paper Type: Free Essay	✅ Subject: Society
✅ Wordcount: 1853 words	✅ Published: 22nd Jul 2021

Why cigarettes should be banned?

Apart from reducing human suffering, abolishing the sale of cigarettes would result in savings in the realm of healthcare costs, increased labour productivity, lessened harms from fires, reduced consumption of scarce physical resources, and a smaller global carbon footprint.

What is a thesis example?

A thesis statement should show exactly what your paper will be about, and will help you keep your paper to a manageable topic. For example, if you’re writing a seven-to-ten page paper on hunger, you might say: World hunger has many causes and effects. This is a weak thesis statement for two major reasons.

Why do advocates of the smoking ban need exaggeration?

Advocates of the smoking ban do not trust ordinary people to resolve any conflict between smokers and non-smokers, or not to chain smoke in front of their babies. In the same way, Simon Davies seems to think that readers need exaggeration and sensationalism in order to be convinced that the smoking ban is wrong.

Did the smoking ban have a devastating effect on society?

The report quotes Jeremy Clarkson in The Sunday Times: ‘The smoking ban, then, has had a devastating effect, not just on pubs and clubs…but on society, which has now become divisive and bitter’. Now, I disagree with the smoking ban, but if it has really transformed society to such an extent, I must have missed something.

Is ‘up in smoke’ a good argument against the smoking ban?

The recent Privacy International report, Civil Liberties: Up in Smoke contains some excellent arguments against the smoking ban. Nevertheless, the persistent hyperbole and exaggeration reflect a condescending approach towards the reader, and undermine the author’s own agenda.

Do smoking bans go too far?

Examples of banning smoking in the home and on the street in the US and Japan make a persuasive case that smoking bans go too far and should be rethought. Unfortunately, the report’s powerful argumentation is weakened by progressively irritating examples of exaggeration and hyperbole.